[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53E8DD8D.3060500@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:13:17 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct
pt_regs"
On 08/11/2014 08:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> No, in *human language*. What does the DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression
>> actually aim to accomplish? If you don't know the innards of the DWARF
>> spec, the whole thing might as well be Hungarian.
>
> Just like the other DW_CFA_def_cfa_* ones it sets the current
> frame address (CFA), just not via one of the pre-canned shortcuts,
> but via an expression (in the case here de-referencing the stack
> pointer to read the top of stack, and then adding the necessary
> offset). So it indeed is similar enough to other .cfi_* annotations we
> use without further comments.
>
Actually, what you had inside the parenteses there is actually a
half-decent comment. I'm going to pretend the rest of this wasn't posted.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists