linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / sleep: Rename symbols, functions and variables related to sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOesGMiohfNDRo1P58NYdQA6tqSLfuPQV85BEDVVo8UvtW=Ctw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:15:22 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / sleep: Rename symbols, functions and variables
 related to sleep

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The names of several symbols, data types, functions and variables
> related to system sleep states are confusing and don't reflect the
> real behavior of those states correctly.
>
> First of all, there generally are two sleep states that require
> platform support and one sleep state that is platform-independent.
> The first two of them are currently known as MEM and STANDBY,
> although these names really only match what the states do on full
> hardware ACPI compliant systems.  MEM in particular is supposed
> to mean "suspend-to-RAM", but in fact it means "the deepest sleep
> state available with platform support".  The definition of STANDBY
> is even more arbitrary.
>
> Moreover, the remaining sleep state that doesn't need platform support
> is currently called FREEZE, which leads to double confusion with the
> process freezer (used during transitions to all sleep states) and
> with the freeze stage of processing devices during hibernation.
>
> For these reasons, rename the PM_SUSPEND_MEM, PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY
> and PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE symbols to PM_SUSPEND_PLATFORM_DEEP,
> PM_SUSPEND_PLATFORM_SHALLOW and PM_SUSPEND_IDLE_SLEEP, respectively,
> everywhere and rename data types, functions and variables related to
> those states to match the new names of the symbols.
>
> This is a semi-mechanical replacement of names and it should not lead
> to any functional differences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

This showed up in -next over this weekend and broke two ARM builds.
Please don't add new code to -next during a merge window.

>From http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/next/next-20140811:

/home/build/work/batch/arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/pm.c:150:12: error:
'suspend_valid_only_mem' undeclared here (not in a function)
  .valid  = suspend_valid_only_mem,

/home/build/work/batch/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.c: In function
'pxa910_pm_valid':
/home/build/work/batch/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.c:243:65: error:
expected ')' before ';' token
  return state == PM_SUSPEND_SHALLOW || (state == PM_SUSPEND_DEEP;
                                                                 ^
/home/build/work/batch/arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.c:244:1: error:
expected ';' before '}' token
 }
 ^


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/