[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812145819.GA7737@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:58:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/33] perf record: Allow the user to disable time stamps
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:08:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> > This patch looks dangerous and misleading to me.
>
> I took it more from the angle: hey, it fixes a regression, i.e.
> -T/--time somehow became a noop, and also it doesn't change any
> default.
>
> It also states that you will get misaccounting, why that would
> happen, althought wording could've been better, as mmaps won't be
> "missing", i.e. they will be there as this governs just
> PERF_SAMPLE_TIME, not perf_event_attr.mmap, so it MMAPs may come
> after samples for its maps.
>
> So, I took it.
>
> How should we proceed?
I'd be fine with applying the patch and fixing the misleading
changelog.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists