[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812152953.GA9820@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:29:53 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/33] perf record: Allow the user to disable time stamps
Em Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:58:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Em Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:08:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > This patch looks dangerous and misleading to me.
> > I took it more from the angle: hey, it fixes a regression, i.e.
> > -T/--time somehow became a noop, and also it doesn't change any
> > default.
> > It also states that you will get misaccounting, why that would
> > happen, althought wording could've been better, as mmaps won't be
> > "missing", i.e. they will be there as this governs just
> > PERF_SAMPLE_TIME, not perf_event_attr.mmap, so it MMAPs may come
> > after samples for its maps.
> > So, I took it.
> > How should we proceed?
> I'd be fine with applying the patch and fixing the misleading
> changelog.
Done:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8affc2b8c27bfc2d6e70827b746f490b62c44eaa
Consider now pulling the perf-core-for-mingo tag there, I updated it
after updating the changelog for this specific commit, all the
rest is the same as in the previous pull req.
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists