[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53EA2BD4.2040903@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:59:32 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Virtualization List <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, jgarzik@...pay.com,
duwe@....de, Amos Kong <akong@...hat.com>,
ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com, tytso@....edu,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio: rng: add derating factor for use by hwrng
core
On 08/11/2014 10:27 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 11 Aug 2014 [15:11:03], H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 11:49 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
>>> The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient
>>> quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the
>>> hypervisor, and we trust the hypervisor to provide real entropy. A
>>> malicious hypervisor is a scenario that's ruled out, so we are certain
>>> the quality of randomness we receive is perfectly trustworthy. Hence,
>>> we use 100% for the factor, indicating maximum confidence in the source.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
>>
>> It isn't "ruled out", it is just irrelevant: if the hypervisor is
>> malicious, the quality of your random number source is the least of your
>> problems.
>
> Yea; I meant ruled out in that sense. Should the commit msg be more
> verbose?
>
Yes, as it is written it is misleading.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists