[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1407861421.3141.21.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:37:01 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, swetland@...gle.com,
ccross@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Phong Tran <tranmanphong@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on patch subjects with "checkpatch"
I think patch subject lines with "checkpatch" in
them are almost never really useful.
Maybe a new checkpatch test to see if a subject line
is perhaps less than informational should be added.
Something like:
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 31a731e..a690515 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2048,6 +2048,13 @@ sub process {
$in_commit_log = 0;
}
+# Check patch subject lines for "checkpatch" (but not checkpatch:)
+ if ($in_header_lines &&
+ $line =~ /^\s*subject:.*\bcheckpatch(?!(?:\.pl)?:)\b/i) {
+ WARN("BAD_PATCH_SUBJECT",
+ "Patch subjects with 'checkpatch' are not generally useful. Describe the change, not the tool that suggests the change.\n" . $herecurr);
+ }
+
# Check signature styles
if (!$in_header_lines &&
$line =~ /^(\s*)([a-z0-9_-]+by:|$signature_tags)(\s*)(.*)/i) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists