| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:07:26 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>, "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen PV domain regression with KASLR enabled (kernel 3.16) On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:53:03AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Bader > <stefan.bader@...onical.com> wrote: > > On 12.08.2014 19:28, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com> wrote: > >>> On 08.08.2014 14:43, David Vrabel wrote: > >>>> On 08/08/14 12:20, Stefan Bader wrote: > >>>>> Unfortunately I have not yet figured out why this happens, but can confirm by > >>>>> compiling with or without CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE being set that without KASLR all > >>>>> is ok, but with it enabled there are issues (actually a dom0 does not even boot > >>>>> as a follow up error). > >>>>> > >>>>> Details can be seen in [1] but basically this is always some portion of a > >>>>> vmalloc allocation failing after hitting a freshly allocated PTE space not being > >>>>> PTE_NONE (usually from a module load triggered by systemd-udevd). In the > >>>>> non-dom0 case this repeats many times but ends in a guest that allows login. In > >>>>> the dom0 case there is a more fatal error at some point causing a crash. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have not tried this for a normal PV guest but for dom0 it also does not help > >>>>> to add "nokaslr" to the kernel command-line. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe it's overlapping with regions of the virtual address space > >>>> reserved for Xen? What the the VA that fails? > >>>> > >>>> David > >>>> > >>> Yeah, there is some code to avoid some regions of memory (like initrd). Maybe > >>> missing p2m tables? I probably need to add debugging to find the failing VA (iow > >>> not sure whether it might be somewhere in the stacktraces in the report). > >>> > >>> The kernel-command line does not seem to be looked at. It should put something > >>> into dmesg and that never shows up. Also today's random feature is other PV > >>> guests crashing after a bit somewhere in the check_for_corruption area... > >> > >> Right now, the kaslr code just deals with initrd, cmdline, etc. If > >> there are other reserved regions that aren't listed in the e820, it'll > >> need to locate and skip them. > >> > >> -Kees > >> > > Making my little steps towards more understanding I figured out that it isn't > > the code that does the relocation. Even with that completely disabled there were > > the vmalloc issues. What causes it seems to be the default of the upper limit > > and that this changes the split between kernel and modules to 1G+1G instead of > > 512M+1.5G. That is the reason why nokaslr has no effect. > > Oh! That's very interesting. There must be some assumption in Xen > about the kernel VM layout then? No. I think most of the changes that look at PTE and PMDs are are all in arch/x86/xen/mmu.c. I wonder if this is xen_cleanhighmap being too aggressive > > -Kees > > -- > Kees Cook > Chrome OS Security > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists