[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140812190947.GD13996@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:09:47 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@...wei.com>, Wuyun <wuyun.wu@...wei.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
arnab.basu@...escale.com, x86@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to
configure MSI/MSI-X
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:26:00PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Introduce a new struct msi_chip apic_msi_chip instead of weak arch
> functions to configure MSI/MSI-X in x86.
Why not 'x86_msi_ops' (see arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c)
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> index 0892ea0..878a06d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void native_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
> void native_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
> unsigned int irq_base, unsigned int irq_offset);
> +extern struct msi_chip *x86_msi_chip;
> #else
> #define native_setup_msi_irqs NULL
> #define native_teardown_msi_irq NULL
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 2609dcd..eb8ab7c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -3077,24 +3077,25 @@ int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int native_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
> +int native_setup_msi_irqs(struct device *dev, int nvec, int type)
> {
> struct msi_desc *msidesc;
> unsigned int irq;
> int node, ret;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>
> /* Multiple MSI vectors only supported with interrupt remapping */
> if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
> return 1;
>
> - node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
> + node = dev_to_node(dev);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
> irq = irq_alloc_hwirq(node);
> if (!irq)
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> - ret = setup_msi_irq(dev, msidesc, irq, 0);
> + ret = setup_msi_irq(pdev, msidesc, irq, 0);
> if (ret < 0) {
> irq_free_hwirq(irq);
> return ret;
> @@ -3214,6 +3215,17 @@ int default_setup_hpet_msi(unsigned int irq, unsigned int id)
> }
> #endif
>
> +struct msi_chip apic_msi_chip = {
> + .setup_irqs = native_setup_msi_irqs,
> + .teardown_irq = native_teardown_msi_irq,
> +};
> +
> +struct msi_chip *arch_get_match_msi_chip(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return x86_msi_chip;
> +}
> +
> +struct msi_chip *x86_msi_chip = &apic_msi_chip;
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
> /*
> * Hypertransport interrupt support
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists