[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140813163015.GT9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:30:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 15/16] rcu: Make RCU-tasks wait for idle
tasks
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:43:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> o drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c, power_saving_thread().
>
> Looks like a kthread that does idle injection. Currently, RCU
> sees it as not a quiescent state. Would it kill these guys to
> put in a comment or two about what this is for???
>
> So adding rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() here might
> actually fix a bug, though it is not clear how long this thing
> actually runs. If only for a few milliseconds, no harm done.
>
> o drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c, clamp_thread().
>
> Looks similar to power_saving_thread(), but for thermal control.
> Probably short term, shouldn't be a problem either way.
>
There's patches somewhere that make that go-away
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/56
Jacob was going to look at that.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists