linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 15/16] rcu: Make RCU-tasks wait for idle tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140813163522.GU9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:35:22 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 tip/core/rcu 15/16] rcu: Make RCU-tasks wait for idle
 tasks

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:43:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So the first three look OK to hook rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit()
> into, but the last two don't look so good.
> 
> That said, if you are OK not tracing the stuff under stop_critical_timings(),
> then I can use the RCU dyntick-idle state and not wake anything up.

Either way, Steve could easily whip up a debug thing that could validate
that. Simply WARN whenever an __mcount happens when under rcu_idle.

And if we make these idle functions small enough that should not be a
problem at all.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped