[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuzo6xQkhg+y0h_WEArVZi9cxVoGAcTBDcwMXza+eQGBTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:34:00 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 01/26] net: filter: add "load 64-bit
immediate" eBPF instruction
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 09:57 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>
>> add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into register.
>> All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction.
>> Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single
>> instruction:
>> insn[0/1].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM
>> insn[0/1].dst_reg = destination register
>> insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit
>> insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit
>>
>> Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM
>> which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register.
>>
>> x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64'
>> arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn
>>
>> Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
>
>
> For follow-ups on this series, can you put the actual motivation
> for this change from the cover letter into this commit log as it
> otherwise doesn't say anything clearly why it is needed. Code and
> test case looks good to me.
ok. As you saw the full explanation is long, so I opted for 'it_does_this'
commit log. In the next rev will add more reasons to this log. Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists