lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:35:26 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sanjay Rao <srao@...hat.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:22:30 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:

> On 08/12, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > Any other ideas?
> 
> To simplify, lets suppose that we only need sum_exec_runtime.
> 
> Perhaps we can do something like this

That would probably work, indeed.

However, it turns out that a seqcount doesn't look too badly either.

The following patch has only been compile tested so far, I am about to
give it a real test.

I believe k_getrusage can probably be changed in the same way.

---8<---

Subject: time,signal: protect cpu use statistics with seqcount

Both times() and clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID) have scalability
issues on large systems, due to both functions being serialized with a
lock.

The lock protects against reporting a wrong value, due to a thread in the
task group exiting, its statistics reporting up to the signal struct, and
that exited task's statistics being counted twice (or not at all).

Protecting that with a lock results in times and clock_gettime being
completely serialized on large systems.

This can be fixed by using a seqcount around the events that gather and
propagate statistics. As an additional benefit, the protection code can
be moved into thread_group_cputime, slightly simplifying the calling
functions.

This way the statistics reporting code can run lockless.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h          |  1 +
 kernel/exit.c                  |  4 ++++
 kernel/fork.c                  |  1 +
 kernel/sched/cputime.c         | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 kernel/sys.c                   |  2 --
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c |  9 ++++-----
 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 857ba40..5670d33 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ struct sighand_struct {
 	atomic_t		count;
 	struct k_sigaction	action[_NSIG];
 	spinlock_t		siglock;
+	seqcount_t		stats_seq; /* write nests inside spinlock */
 	wait_queue_head_t	signalfd_wqh;
 };
 
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 32c58f7..019c263 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		 * will have been the last reference on the signal_struct.
 		 */
 		task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
+		write_seqcount_begin(&sighand->stats_seq);
 		sig->utime += utime;
 		sig->stime += stime;
 		sig->gtime += task_gtime(tsk);
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		sig->oublock += task_io_get_oublock(tsk);
 		task_io_accounting_add(&sig->ioac, &tsk->ioac);
 		sig->sum_sched_runtime += tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;
+		write_seqcount_end(&sighand->stats_seq);
 	}
 
 	sig->nr_threads--;
@@ -1041,6 +1043,7 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
 		 */
 		thread_group_cputime_adjusted(p, &tgutime, &tgstime);
 		spin_lock_irq(&p->real_parent->sighand->siglock);
+		write_seqcount_begin(&p->real_parent->sighand->stats_seq);
 		psig = p->real_parent->signal;
 		sig = p->signal;
 		psig->cutime += tgutime + sig->cutime;
@@ -1065,6 +1068,7 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
 			psig->cmaxrss = maxrss;
 		task_io_accounting_add(&psig->ioac, &p->ioac);
 		task_io_accounting_add(&psig->ioac, &sig->ioac);
+		write_seqcount_end(&p->real_parent->sighand->stats_seq);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&p->real_parent->sighand->siglock);
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 1380d8a..4681694 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1749,6 +1749,7 @@ static void sighand_ctor(void *data)
 	struct sighand_struct *sighand = data;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&sighand->siglock);
+	seqcount_init(&sighand->stats_seq);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&sighand->signalfd_wqh);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 72fdf06..370fd67 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -286,25 +286,34 @@ static __always_inline bool steal_account_process_tick(void)
 void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times)
 {
 	struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal;
+	struct sighand_struct *sighand;
 	cputime_t utime, stime;
 	struct task_struct *t;
-
-	times->utime = sig->utime;
-	times->stime = sig->stime;
-	times->sum_exec_runtime = sig->sum_sched_runtime;
+	int seq;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	/* make sure we can trust tsk->thread_group list */
-	if (!likely(pid_alive(tsk)))
+	sighand = rcu_dereference(tsk->sighand);
+	if (unlikely(!sighand))
 		goto out;
 
-	t = tsk;
 	do {
-		task_cputime(t, &utime, &stime);
-		times->utime += utime;
-		times->stime += stime;
-		times->sum_exec_runtime += task_sched_runtime(t);
-	} while_each_thread(tsk, t);
+		seq = read_seqcount_begin(&sighand->stats_seq);
+		times->utime = sig->utime;
+		times->stime = sig->stime;
+		times->sum_exec_runtime = sig->sum_sched_runtime;
+
+		/* make sure we can trust tsk->thread_group list */
+		if (!likely(pid_alive(tsk)))
+			goto out;
+
+		t = tsk;
+		do {
+			task_cputime(t, &utime, &stime);
+			times->utime += utime;
+			times->stime += stime;
+			times->sum_exec_runtime += task_sched_runtime(t);
+		} while_each_thread(tsk, t);
+	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&sighand->stats_seq, seq));
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
@@ -617,9 +626,6 @@ void task_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *st)
 	cputime_adjust(&cputime, &p->prev_cputime, ut, st);
 }
 
-/*
- * Must be called with siglock held.
- */
 void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *st)
 {
 	struct task_cputime cputime;
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index ce81291..b663664 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -862,11 +862,9 @@ void do_sys_times(struct tms *tms)
 {
 	cputime_t tgutime, tgstime, cutime, cstime;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	thread_group_cputime_adjusted(current, &tgutime, &tgstime);
 	cutime = current->signal->cutime;
 	cstime = current->signal->cstime;
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	tms->tms_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(tgutime);
 	tms->tms_stime = cputime_to_clock_t(tgstime);
 	tms->tms_cutime = cputime_to_clock_t(cutime);
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 3b89464..1bde818 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -781,14 +781,14 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec *itp)
 		cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
 	} else {
 		struct sighand_struct *sighand;
-		unsigned long flags;
 
 		/*
 		 * Protect against sighand release/switch in exit/exec and
 		 * also make timer sampling safe if it ends up calling
 		 * thread_group_cputime().
 		 */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		sighand = rcu_dereference(p->sighand);
 		if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
 			/*
 			 * The process has been reaped.
@@ -798,10 +798,9 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec *itp)
 			timer->it.cpu.expires = 0;
 			sample_to_timespec(timer->it_clock, timer->it.cpu.expires,
 					   &itp->it_value);
-		} else {
+		} else
 			cpu_timer_sample_group(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
-			unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
 	if (now < timer->it.cpu.expires) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ