linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] firmware: Do not use WARN_ON(!spin_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1407954094-26126-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:21:34 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] firmware: Do not use WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked())

spin_is_locked() always returns false for uniprocessor configurations
in several architectures, so do not use WARN_ON with it.
Use lockdep_assert_held() instead to also reduce overhead in
non-debug kernels.

Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
---
v2: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of WARN_ON_SMP.

 drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
index f0a4364..5abe943 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_remove);
  */
 static void efivar_entry_list_del_unlock(struct efivar_entry *entry)
 {
-	WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(&__efivars->lock);
 
 	list_del(&entry->list);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int __efivar_entry_delete(struct efivar_entry *entry)
 	const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
 	efi_status_t status;
 
-	WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(&__efivars->lock);
 
 	status = ops->set_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
 				   &entry->var.VendorGuid,
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ struct efivar_entry *efivar_entry_find(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t guid,
 	int strsize1, strsize2;
 	bool found = false;
 
-	WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(&__efivars->lock);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, head, list) {
 		strsize1 = ucs2_strsize(name, 1024);
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ int __efivar_entry_get(struct efivar_entry *entry, u32 *attributes,
 	const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
 	efi_status_t status;
 
-	WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
+	lockdep_assert_held(&__efivars->lock);
 
 	status = ops->get_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
 				   &entry->var.VendorGuid,
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/