linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf report: Set proper sort_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140813201434.GI2718@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:14:34 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	naota@...sp.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Set proper sort__mode for the branch option

Em Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 02:45:34PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Naohiro,
> 
> (CC'ing Stephane)
> 
> > When you specify "--branch-stack"("-b" for short) or
> > "--no-branch-stack", "branch_mode" variable is set to 1 or 0
> > respectively. However, the code is just checking if the variable is -1
> > or not, ignoring "branch_mode == 1" case. Thus "perf report -b" dose not
> > show its result with the branch sorted mode. This patch fix the problem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naota@...sp.net>
> 
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> 
> Thanks for fixing this!
> Namhyung

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/