linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAN8TOE8w5bUT5byHiJrYr8AzaZ+EADzE+aoH6f2x2tFc1+1eQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:11:50 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
	Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support

Ping (Olof or Matt?)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Brian Norris
<computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:30:40AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > From: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>
>> >
>> > Add the UART definitions needed to support earlyprintk on brcmstb machines.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@...il.com>
>> > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
>>
>> I noticed that you sent this to the patch system.  I asked Olof last
>> night whether he had anything in arm-soc touching Kconfig.debug, and
>> he does (a number of other platforms have updated it.)  This means
>> that if I apply it to my tree, it may conflict, so I'm reluctant to
>> take it.
>
> OK... Matt told me that such patches go through you. So which is it?
> Should all Kconfig.debug patches go through the arm-soc route?

How should this get in? Should I rebase/resend through Matt and
arm-soc? Or can you pick this up as-is?

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/