[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140813224440.GA10808@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:44:40 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
Amos Kong <akong@...hat.com>,
ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: rng: add derating factor for use by hwrng core
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:39:07AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> The khwrngd thread is started when a hwrng device of sufficient
> quality is registered. The virtio-rng device is backed by the
> hypervisor, and we trust the hypervisor to provide real entropy.
>
> A malicious hypervisor is a scenario that's irrelevant -- such a setup
> is bound to cause all sorts of badness, and a compromised hwrng is not
> the biggest threat.
s/malicious/malicious or badly implemented/
s/is not the biggest threat/is the least of the user's worries/
> Given this, we are certain the quality of randomness we receive is
> perfectly trustworthy. Hence, we use 100% for the factor, indicating
> maximum confidence in the source.
s/we are certain/we might as well assume that/
I won't insist on the wording changes, but I think it's a better way
of phrasing things.
Cheers,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists