lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140814142404.GA28211@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:24:04 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>, Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Sanjay Rao <srao@...hat.com>, Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock On 08/13, Rik van Riel wrote: > > @@ -862,11 +862,9 @@ void do_sys_times(struct tms *tms) > { > cputime_t tgutime, tgstime, cutime, cstime; > > - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); > thread_group_cputime_adjusted(current, &tgutime, &tgstime); > cutime = current->signal->cutime; > cstime = current->signal->cstime; > - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); Ah, wait, there is another problem afaics... thread_group_cputime_adjusted()->cputime_adjust() plays with signal->prev_cputime and thus it needs siglock or stats_lock to ensure it can't race with itself. Not sure it is safe to simply take the lock in cputime_adjust(), this should be checked. OTOH, do_task_stat() already calls task_cputime_adjusted() lockless and this looks wrong or I missed something. So perhaps we need a lock in or around cputime_adjust() anyway. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists