[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hwqa9ww6n.fsf@paris.lan>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:32:16 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: linux@....linux.org.uk,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Jonathan Austin <Jonathan.Austin@....com>,
Chao Xie Linux <xiechao.mail@...il.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle/cpuidle-big_little: fix reading cpu id part number
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com> writes:
> Commit af040ffc9ba1 ("ARM: make it easier to check the CPU part number
> correctly") changed ARM_CPU_PART_X masks, and the way they are returned and
> checked against. Usage of read_cpuid_part_number() is now deprecated, and
> calling places updated accordingly. This actually broke cpuidle-big_little
> initialization, as bl_idle_driver_init() performs a check using an hardcoded
> mask on cpu_id.
>
> Create an interface to perform the check (that is now even easier to read).
> Define also a proper mask (ARM_CPU_PART_MASK) that makes this kind of checks
> cleaner and helps preventing bugs in the future. Update usage accordingly.
[...]
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
FWIW, I can confirm that this patch is needed for cpuidle-big_little to
work on the Exynos5800/Chromebook2.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists