[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140816130456.GH9305@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:04:56 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem-hotplug: let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory
regions in __next_mem_range()
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:31:22PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> Let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range(),
> it is used to to prevent memblock from allocating hotpluggable memory
> for the kernel at early time. The code is the same as __next_mem_range_rev().
>
> Clear hotpluggable flag before releasing free pages to the buddy allocator.
Please try to explain "why" in addition to "what". Why do we need to
clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early() in addition to
numa_clear_node_hotplug() in x86 numa.c? Does this make x86 code
redundant? If not, why?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists