[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53EF6C79.3000603@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:36:41 +0800
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
"Wen Congyang" <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem-hotplug: let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory
regions in __next_mem_range()
On 2014/8/16 21:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:31:22PM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> Let memblock skip the hotpluggable memory regions in __next_mem_range(),
>> it is used to to prevent memblock from allocating hotpluggable memory
>> for the kernel at early time. The code is the same as __next_mem_range_rev().
>>
>> Clear hotpluggable flag before releasing free pages to the buddy allocator.
>
> Please try to explain "why" in addition to "what". Why do we need to
> clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early() in addition to
> numa_clear_node_hotplug() in x86 numa.c? Does this make x86 code
> redundant? If not, why?
>
Hi Tejun,
numa_clear_node_hotplug()? There is only numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug().
If we don't clear hotpluggable flag in free_low_memory_core_early(), the
memory which marked hotpluggable flag will not free to buddy allocator.
Because __next_mem_range() will skip them.
free_low_memory_core_early
for_each_free_mem_range
for_each_mem_range
__next_mem_range
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists