[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10ad24319e6a486db77c31a5a911140e@BN1PR0301MB0609.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:14:02 +0000
From: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv6 2/2] dt/bindings: Add the DT binding documentation for
endianness
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/2] dt/bindings: Add the DT binding documentation for
> endianness
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:23:03PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> > Device-Tree binding for device endianness
> > Index Device Endianness properties
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > 1 BE 'big-endian'
> > 2 LE 'little-endian'
> >
> > For one device driver, which will run in different scenarios above
> > on different SoCs using the devicetree, we need one way to simplify
> > this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/regmap/regmap.txt | 47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regmap/regmap.txt
>
> Sorry for jumping in so late. I think this binding documentation needs
> to be moved somewhere else. regmap is a Linux kernel specific
> implementation detail and therefore has no place in device tree binding
> descriptions. Furthermore the endianness properties described herein do
> apply to drivers that don't use regmap.
>
> Perhaps we need some top-level file that describes generic properties
> such as this?
>
> Thierry
Yes, I do agree.
And there are many devices that have the endian issue without using the
Regmap in our LS* SoCs.
And I also think one generic binding description of this will be much
better.
Where should we place it? In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/, or...?
Thanks,
BRs
Xiubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists