linux-kernel - Re: REGRESSION: 8fc5b4d: Unable to compile x86_64 kernel with x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:07:01 -0500
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@...nzmann.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, ubuntu@....tj
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: 8fc5b4d: Unable to compile x86_64 kernel with x86_32 userland

It says "32-bit mode" which means it is another issue: we are dropping -m64 at some point.

On August 20, 2014 7:56:30 AM CDT, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:24:08AM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
>> Hello Vivek,
>> commit 8fc5b4d introduces a regression that no longer allows to
>compile
>> x86_64 kernel under x86_32 userland. TJ on freenode/#kernel did
>analyze
>> it:
>> 
>> > (mini) [~/work/linux-2.6] make
>> > scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
>> >   CHK     include/config/kernel.release
>> >   UPD     include/config/kernel.release
>> >   CHK     include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
>> >   CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
>> >   UPD     include/generated/utsrelease.h
>> >   CC      arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.o
>> > arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.c:1:0: error: code model 'large' not
>supported in the 32 bit mode
>> > make[1]: *** [arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.o] Error 1
>> > make: *** [archprepare] Error 2
>> 
>> 08:10 < TJ-> Glanzmann: The purgatory code from kexec is specifying
>".code64"
>> 08:11 < TJ-> Glanzmann: so when your local 32-bit linker tries to
>deal with that ... it errors
>> 08:14 < TJ-> Glanzmann: there's only one introducing the purgatory
>stuff
>> 08:14 < TJ-> 8fc5b4d Fri Aug 8 15:57:32 2014 -0700 Vivek Goyal
>purgatory: core purgatory functionality
>
>Hi Thomas,
>
>Thanks for the report. I think this is also happening because purgatory
>is
>right now being compiled with compiler option -mcmodel=large. There was
>another report where older version of gcc did not support
>-mcmodel=large.
>
>A patch is sitting in akpm's tree. That patch puts the new code under
>a new config option CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE. So as long as you don't enable
>CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y, you should be fine. This should not impact any of
>the existing functionality. Just that you will not get the benefit of
>new system call.
>
>http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/kexec-create-a-new-config-option-config_kexec_file-for-new-syscall.patch
>
>I hope this patch gets merged soon.
>
>In the mean time I am trying to figure out how can I move away from
>using -mcmodel=large for purgatory.
>
>Thanks
>Vivek

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/