lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140820125630.GA12786@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:56:30 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@...nzmann.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, ubuntu@....tj
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: 8fc5b4d: Unable to compile x86_64 kernel with x86_32
 userland

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 08:24:08AM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
> commit 8fc5b4d introduces a regression that no longer allows to compile
> x86_64 kernel under x86_32 userland. TJ on freenode/#kernel did analyze
> it:
> 
> > (mini) [~/work/linux-2.6] make
> > scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig Kconfig
> >   CHK     include/config/kernel.release
> >   UPD     include/config/kernel.release
> >   CHK     include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
> >   CHK     include/generated/utsrelease.h
> >   UPD     include/generated/utsrelease.h
> >   CC      arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.o
> > arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.c:1:0: error: code model 'large' not supported in the 32 bit mode
> > make[1]: *** [arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [archprepare] Error 2
> 
> 08:10 < TJ-> Glanzmann: The purgatory code from kexec is specifying ".code64"
> 08:11 < TJ-> Glanzmann: so when your local 32-bit linker tries to deal with that ... it errors
> 08:14 < TJ-> Glanzmann: there's only one introducing the purgatory stuff
> 08:14 < TJ-> 8fc5b4d Fri Aug 8 15:57:32 2014 -0700 Vivek Goyal purgatory: core purgatory functionality

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for the report. I think this is also happening because purgatory is
right now being compiled with compiler option -mcmodel=large. There was
another report where older version of gcc did not support -mcmodel=large.

A patch is sitting in akpm's tree. That patch puts the new code under
a new config option CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE. So as long as you don't enable
CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y, you should be fine. This should not impact any of
the existing functionality. Just that you will not get the benefit of
new system call.

http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/kexec-create-a-new-config-option-config_kexec_file-for-new-syscall.patch

I hope this patch gets merged soon.

In the mean time I am trying to figure out how can I move away from
using -mcmodel=large for purgatory.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ