linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] clk: ti: Fix up error checks in set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGo_u6onBbuNC9sLvBE5nFA7wMLkrsmbS3k2rgR1o6f1bYWvdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:49:49 -0500
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] clk: ti: Fix up error checks in set_rate (and div 0 error)

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com> wrote:
> On 08/18/2014 07:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> The following patches are based on v3.17-rc1
>> Prior to this series: http://slexy.org/view/s20QH6PW4x (notice the /0 div
>> error spam at initial boot log)
>> After this series: http://slexy.org/view/s20tPNXPf4
>
>
> Yeah, valid findings. However, you did not root-cause the problem, just
> added a bandaid for the most obvious errors.

Yep, it does seem that omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate had the same
bandaid as well :).. but checks did make sense..

> I will queue these patches for 3.17-rc fixes anyway, but will post an actual fix in a bit.

Thanks for rootcausing.

---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/