linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] ARM: zynq: Rename 'zynq_platform_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c7c26e1-4098-4252-a719-fb7b7205be61@BN1AFFO11FD006.protection.gbl>
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:02:35 -0700
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] ARM: zynq: Rename 'zynq_platform_cpu_die'

On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 02:28PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 10:41 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > Match the naming pattern of all other SMP ops and rename
> > zynq_platform_cpu_die --> zynq_cpu_die.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
> > index 04e578718aa2..95933c5e70e1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int zynq_cpu_kill(unsigned cpu)
> >   *
> >   * Called with IRQs disabled
> >   */
> > -static void zynq_platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> > +static void zynq_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> >  {
> >  	zynq_slcr_cpu_state_write(cpu, true);
> >  
> > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ struct smp_operations zynq_smp_ops __initdata = {
> >  	.smp_boot_secondary	= zynq_boot_secondary,
> >  	.smp_secondary_init	= zynq_secondary_init,
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > -	.cpu_die		= zynq_platform_cpu_die,
> > +	.cpu_die		= zynq_cpu_die,
> >  	.cpu_kill		= zynq_cpu_kill,
> >  #endif
> >  };
> 
> Will be good if you can move fix that kernel-doc format for this function
> too. It is just nice to have thing.

All these SMP-ops should be documented in the header defining that
struct, shouldn't they?

	Sören

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/