[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140821190020.GA8703@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:00:20 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] mempolicy: fix show_numa_map() vs exec() +
do_set_mempolicy() race
On 08/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I belive that 9e7814404b77c3e8 "hold task->mempolicy while numa_maps scans"
> was wrong and it doesn't fix the problem.
See 2/4.
> I'll try to send the fix tomorrow, could you review the initial preparations?
> To me, these changes make sense as cleanups in any case, but I don't really
> understand this code and this was only compile tested.
Untested again because I do not know how, please review ;) On top of
"mempolicy: get_task_policy() cleanups/preparations" series.
I'll send the final cleanups later.
Oleg.
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 33 ++++++-----------------
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 5 ++-
mm/mempolicy.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists