[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201408251007.22393.marex@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:07:22 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@...escale.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] spi: spi-imx: add DMA support
On Saturday, August 23, 2014 at 02:13:55 AM, Robin Gong wrote:
> After enable DMA
Please also add a commit message which describes the change, not only some test
results.
[...]
> @@ -911,6 +1194,13 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) goto out_put_per;
>
> spi_imx->spi_clk = clk_get_rate(spi_imx->clk_per);
> + /*
> + * Only validated on i.mx6 now, can remove the constrain if validated on
> + * other chips.
> + */
Given that the check below tests for imx51_ecspi_devtype_data ... does that
mean, that this code was never tested on MX51 and MX53, yet will be enabled
for those chips and might possibly break them ?
> + if (spi_imx->devtype_data == &imx51_ecspi_devtype_data
> + && spi_imx_sdma_init(&pdev->dev, spi_imx, master, res))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma setup error,use pio instead\n");
>
> spi_imx->devtype_data->reset(spi_imx);
>
> @@ -949,6 +1239,7 @@ static int spi_imx_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev) writel(0, spi_imx->base + MXC_CSPICTRL);
> clk_unprepare(spi_imx->clk_ipg);
> clk_unprepare(spi_imx->clk_per);
> + spi_imx_sdma_exit(spi_imx);
> spi_master_put(master);
>
> return 0;
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists