[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140826123242.GC3285@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:32:42 -0400
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix dev_t liftime allocations
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:52:55PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> Since the partition's release may be invoked from call_rcu's soft-irq
> context, the ext_dev_idr's mutex had to be replaced with a spinlock so
> as not so sleep.
> @@ -420,9 +420,9 @@ int blk_alloc_devt(struct hd_struct *part, dev_t *devt)
> }
>
> /* allocate ext devt */
> - mutex_lock(&ext_devt_mutex);
> + spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
> idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_KERNEL);
> - mutex_unlock(&ext_devt_mutex);
> + spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
Can't use GFP_KERNEL if we're protected with a spinlock. See the comment
in lib/idr.c about idr_preload:
+ idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
- mutex_lock(&ext_devt_mutex);
+ spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
- idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_KERNEL);
+ idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_NOWAIT);
- mutex_unlock(&ext_devt_mutex);
+ spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists