linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark initialization code as such

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1409071785-26015-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:49:45 +0200
From:	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark initialization code as such

A few of the initialization functions are missing the __init annotation.
Fix this and thereby allow ~680 additional bytes of code to be released
after initialization.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c  |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c |    8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 696ade311d..5625799f93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
  * BTS, PEBS probe and setup
  */
 
-void intel_ds_init(void)
+void __init intel_ds_init(void)
 {
 	/*
 	 * No support for 32bit formats
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 9dd2459a4c..4af10617de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static const int snb_lbr_sel_map[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX] = {
 };
 
 /* core */
-void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
+void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
 {
 	x86_pmu.lbr_nr     = 4;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos    = MSR_LBR_TOS;
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
 }
 
 /* nehalem/westmere */
-void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
+void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
 {
 	x86_pmu.lbr_nr     = 16;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos    = MSR_LBR_TOS;
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
 }
 
 /* sandy bridge */
-void intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
+void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
 {
 	x86_pmu.lbr_nr	 = 16;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos	 = MSR_LBR_TOS;
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
 }
 
 /* atom */
-void intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
+void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
 {
 	/*
 	 * only models starting at stepping 10 seems
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/