linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwi-S27_maZXU+baOqPAYfi_NTGcfbnRnk45+B8+i4hVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:17:55 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
	Bean Anderson <bean@...lsystems.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes?

FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series
with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the preemption
disable).

Although with the whole i387 state I always hope somebody else checks
it too, and it's obviously not 3.17 material any more (possibly with
the exception of the afore-mentioned preemption patch, although even
that might be better off as 3.18 + stable)

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/