lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:17:55 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>, Bean Anderson <bean@...lsystems.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote: > > Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes? FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the preemption disable). Although with the whole i387 state I always hope somebody else checks it too, and it's obviously not 3.17 material any more (possibly with the exception of the afore-mentioned preemption patch, although even that might be better off as 3.18 + stable) Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists