[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54002E2E.7030301@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:39:26 +0200
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
ohering@...e.com, jbottomley@...allels.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Force discovery of LUNs that
may have been removed.
On 08/29/14 08:19, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 04:42 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> How are distros handling 0x6/0x3f/0x0e (report luns changed) when it
>> gets passed to userspace? Is everyone kicking off a new full (add and
>> delete) scan to handle this or logging it? Is the driver returning this
>> when the LUNs change?
>>
> Currently it's logged to userspace and ignored.
> Doing an automated rescan has proven to be dangerous, as it
> might disconnect any LUNs which are still in use by applications.
> Especially HA or database setups tends to become very annoyed
> when you do an automated rescan.
Has it already been considered to add newly discovered LUNs
automatically and to leave it to the user to remove stale LUNs manually
? That would be similar to what the rescan-scsi-bus.sh script does
without option -r/--remove.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists