[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140901095127.GK7374@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 10:51:27 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, wsa@...-dreams.de,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: add support for Diolan DLN-2 devices
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> >
> >> This patch implements the USB part of the Diolan USB-I2C/SPI/GPIO
> >> Master Adapter DLN-2. Details about the device can be found here:
> >>
> >> https://www.diolan.com/i2c/i2c_interface.html.
> >>
> >> Information about the USB protocol can be found in the Programmer's
> >> Reference Manual [1], see section 1.7.
> >>
> >> Because the hardware has a single transmit endpoint and a single
> >> receive endpoint the communication between the various DLN2 drivers
> >> and the hardware will be muxed/demuxed by this driver.
> >>
> >> Each DLN2 module will be identified by the handle field within the DLN2
> >> message header. If a DLN2 module issues multiple commands in parallel
> >> they will be identified by the echo counter field in the message header.
> >>
> >> The DLN2 modules can use the dln2_transfer() function to issue a
> >> command and wait for its response. They can also register a callback
> >> that is going to be called when a specific event id is generated by
> >> the device (e.g. GPIO interrupts). The device uses handle 0 for
> >> sending events.
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.diolan.com/downloads/dln-api-manual.pdf
> >
> > MFD is not a dumping ground for misfit h/w. Almost all of this code
> > looks like it belongs in drivers/usb. Please move it there.
> >
>
> We initially submitted this driver as a pure USB driver, with our own
> module registration mechanism, but during the first round of reviews
> people pointed out that a MFD driver is the better approach, and I
> agree. I also see that there are already a couple of USB drivers
> implemented as MFD drivers.
Can you link me to your previous submission please?
> Do you see a better approach?
You should have a small MFD driver which controls resources and
registers children. All other functionality should live in their
respective drivers/X locations i.e. USB functionallity should normally
live in drivers/usb.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists