[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5405F7E1.1090505@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:01:21 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, agraf@...e.de,
valentine.sinitsyn@...il.com, jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
gleb@...udius-systems.com, avi@...udius-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: nSVM: propagate the NPF EXITINFO to the guest
Il 02/09/2014 18:46, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> > How about an io-port emulated on
>> > L1 but passed through to L2 by the nested hypervisor. On emulation of
>> > INS or OUTS, KVM would need to read/write to an L2 address space,
> It would need to read/write to *L1* (that's where the VMCB's IOIO map
> lies), which could result into a regular page fault injected into L1.
Nevermind, the VMCB's IO bitmap is a guest physical address. I see what
you mean now. nested_svm_intercept_ioio would return NESTED_EXIT_HOST
and proceed to emulate the read/write. This could indeed cause a NPF.
For now I'll remove the WARN_ON.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists