[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x498um26jos.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:01:07 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kick In <pierre-andre.morey@...onical.com>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-merge: fix blk_recount_segments
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> writes:
> On 09/02/2014 09:02 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE is set at default for blk-mq devices,
>> so bio->bi_phys_segment computed may be bigger than
>> queue_max_segments(q) for blk-mq devices, then drivers will
>> fail to handle the case, for example, BUG_ON() in
>> virtio_queue_rq() can be triggerd for virtio-blk:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1359146
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by ignoring the QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE
>> flag if the computed bio->bi_phys_segment is bigger than
>> queue_max_segments(q), and the regression is caused by commit
>> 05f1dd53152173(block: add queue flag for disabling SG merging).
>>
>> Reported-by: Kick In <pierre-andre.morey@...onical.com>
>> Tested-by: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
>
> Thanks Ming, this looks nice and clean. Will apply for 3.17.
This sounds an awful lot like the bug I fixed in dm:
commit 200612ec33e555a356eebc717630b866ae2b694f
Author: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Date: Fri Aug 8 11:03:41 2014 -0400
dm table: propagate QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE
Commit 05f1dd5 ("block: add queue flag for disabling SG merging")
introduced a new queue flag: QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE. This gets set by
default in blk_mq_init_queue for mq-enabled devices. The effect of
the flag is to bypass the SG segment merging. Instead, the
bio->bi_vcnt is used as the number of hardware segments.
With a device mapper target on top of a device with
QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE set, we can end up sending down more segments
than a driver is prepared to handle. I ran into this when backporting
the virtio_blk mq support. It triggerred this BUG_ON, in
virtio_queue_rq:
BUG_ON(req->nr_phys_segments + 2 > vblk->sg_elems);
...
Is bcache a stacking driver in this case? Should it not inherit this
flag, just as DM now does?
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists