linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/26] Revert "serial: uart: add hw flow control support configuration"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54063D96.30703@hurleysoftware.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:58:46 -0400
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
CC:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] Revert "serial: uart: add hw flow control support
 configuration"

On 09/02/2014 05:50 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> On 09/02/2014 05:39 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>  Finally, this patch
>> supposes to fix existing bugs in the serial core for auto CTS-enabled
>> hardware, but does not include the class of hardware for which these
>> bugs exist.
> 
> What is this? What class of hardware are you referring to?

UART_CAP_AFE and UART_CAP_EFR hardware.

> As discussed, I will send an updated patch for this as discussed..

Great.

And since that patch will touch every single line this reverts (and more)
with a different solution, I see no reason not to back this out.

Plus, as you can see, you're holding up progress.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/