linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make tuning block table endian agnostic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoboJGTzF3aQ=YBpWyVT6opTMgz_6gpOo5BRX30+hfCBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:36:34 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
	Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
	Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make tuning block table endian agnostic

On 3 September 2014 01:58, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> If we're tuning on a big-endian CPU we'll never determine we properly
> tuned the device because we compare the data we received from the
> controller with a table that assumes the CPU is little-endian.
> Change the table to be an array of bytes instead of 32-bit words
> so we can use memcmp() without needing to byte-swap every word
> depending on the endianess of the CPU.
>
> Cc: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>
> Cc: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
> Fixes: 415b5a75da43 "mmc: sdhci-msm: Add platform_execute_tuning implementation"
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

Hi Stephen,

If you want me to pick this up, please repost to linux-mmc as well.
Otherwise you have my ack for it!

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 40573a58486a..5aabffc15ae8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -47,22 +47,34 @@
>  #define CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_SHIFT 24
>  #define CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_MASK  (7 << CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_SHIFT)
>
> -static const u32 tuning_block_64[] = {
> -       0x00ff0fff, 0xccc3ccff, 0xffcc3cc3, 0xeffefffe,
> -       0xddffdfff, 0xfbfffbff, 0xff7fffbf, 0xefbdf777,
> -       0xf0fff0ff, 0x3cccfc0f, 0xcfcc33cc, 0xeeffefff,
> -       0xfdfffdff, 0xffbfffdf, 0xfff7ffbb, 0xde7b7ff7
> +static const u8 tuning_block_64[] = {
> +       0xff, 0x0f, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0xcc, 0xc3, 0xcc,
> +       0xc3, 0x3c, 0xcc, 0xff, 0xfe, 0xff, 0xfe, 0xef,
> +       0xff, 0xdf, 0xff, 0xdd, 0xff, 0xfb, 0xff, 0xfb,
> +       0xbf, 0xff, 0x7f, 0xff, 0x77, 0xf7, 0xbd, 0xef,
> +       0xff, 0xf0, 0xff, 0xf0, 0x0f, 0xfc, 0xcc, 0x3c,
> +       0xcc, 0x33, 0xcc, 0xcf, 0xff, 0xef, 0xff, 0xee,
> +       0xff, 0xfd, 0xff, 0xfd, 0xdf, 0xff, 0xbf, 0xff,
> +       0xbb, 0xff, 0xf7, 0xff, 0xf7, 0x7f, 0x7b, 0xde,
>  };
>
> -static const u32 tuning_block_128[] = {
> -       0xff00ffff, 0x0000ffff, 0xccccffff, 0xcccc33cc,
> -       0xcc3333cc, 0xffffcccc, 0xffffeeff, 0xffeeeeff,
> -       0xffddffff, 0xddddffff, 0xbbffffff, 0xbbffffff,
> -       0xffffffbb, 0xffffff77, 0x77ff7777, 0xffeeddbb,
> -       0x00ffffff, 0x00ffffff, 0xccffff00, 0xcc33cccc,
> -       0x3333cccc, 0xffcccccc, 0xffeeffff, 0xeeeeffff,
> -       0xddffffff, 0xddffffff, 0xffffffdd, 0xffffffbb,
> -       0xffffbbbb, 0xffff77ff, 0xff7777ff, 0xeeddbb77
> +static const u8 tuning_block_128[] = {
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x33, 0xcc, 0xcc,
> +       0xcc, 0x33, 0x33, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xff, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0xee, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xee, 0xee, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xdd, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xdd, 0xdd,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xbb, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xbb,
> +       0xbb, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x77, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> +       0x77, 0x77, 0xff, 0x77, 0xbb, 0xdd, 0xee, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x00,
> +       0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0x33, 0xcc,
> +       0xcc, 0xcc, 0x33, 0x33, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xcc, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xee, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xee, 0xee,
> +       0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xdd, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xdd,
> +       0xdd, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xbb, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
> +       0xbb, 0xbb, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x77, 0xff, 0xff,
> +       0xff, 0x77, 0x77, 0xff, 0x77, 0xbb, 0xdd, 0xee,
>  };
>
>  struct sdhci_msm_host {
> @@ -359,7 +371,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
>  {
>         int tuning_seq_cnt = 3;
>         u8 phase, *data_buf, tuned_phases[16], tuned_phase_cnt = 0;
> -       const u32 *tuning_block_pattern = tuning_block_64;
> +       const u8 *tuning_block_pattern = tuning_block_64;
>         int size = sizeof(tuning_block_64);     /* Pattern size in bytes */
>         int rc;
>         struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/