[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904155613.GD4120@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:56:13 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Add Haswell-EP uncore support
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:19:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:29:26AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > > index 4785ee8..2485fd9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > > @@ -883,6 +883,8 @@ static int __init uncore_pci_init(void)
> > > case 62: /* Ivy Bridge-EP */
> > > ret = ivbep_uncore_pci_init();
> > > break;
> > > + case 63: /* Haswell-EP */
> > > + ret = hswep_uncore_pci_init();
> >
> > Is the lack of break intentional? If yes please add a /* FALL THROUGH */
> > comment.
>
> This does look inconsistent with the surrounding code, which does
> suggest it was indeed an oversight and not on purpose.
>
> Zheng?
Yes it was a bug. Zheng left Intel and I have taken over the driver.
I'll send a version with this and some other issues fixed shortly.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists