[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904081928.GL3190@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:19:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, acme@...radead.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: Add Haswell-EP uncore support
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:29:26AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > index 4785ee8..2485fd9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -883,6 +883,8 @@ static int __init uncore_pci_init(void)
> > case 62: /* Ivy Bridge-EP */
> > ret = ivbep_uncore_pci_init();
> > break;
> > + case 63: /* Haswell-EP */
> > + ret = hswep_uncore_pci_init();
>
> Is the lack of break intentional? If yes please add a /* FALL THROUGH */
> comment.
This does look inconsistent with the surrounding code, which does
suggest it was indeed an oversight and not on purpose.
Zheng?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists