| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5408D81C.7070602@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:22:36 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>, Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make tuning block table endian agnostic On 09/04/14 03:53, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 4 September 2014 07:06, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote: >> >> In dw-mmc.c, tuning_block values are same. >> So I think we can move these value into generic header. how about? > Actually, I believe these values comes from the eMMC specification? > Shouldn't they be moved to the mmc core instead? That sounds like good consolidation, but can we do that in a follow-up patch? This fixes the driver for me and I was hoping to make something minimal to go back to stable trees. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists