| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 06:58:12 +0900 From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>, Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make tuning block table endian agnostic On 09/05/2014 06:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/04/14 03:53, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 4 September 2014 07:06, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote: >>> >>> In dw-mmc.c, tuning_block values are same. >>> So I think we can move these value into generic header. how about? >> Actually, I believe these values comes from the eMMC specification? >> Shouldn't they be moved to the mmc core instead? > > That sounds like good consolidation, but can we do that in a follow-up > patch? This fixes the driver for me and I was hoping to make something > minimal to go back to stable trees. Sure, if my opinion is ok, i will do it after apply your patches. Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists