[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5408E074.7090008@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 06:58:12 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: Make tuning block table endian agnostic
On 09/05/2014 06:22 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/04/14 03:53, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 4 September 2014 07:06, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In dw-mmc.c, tuning_block values are same.
>>> So I think we can move these value into generic header. how about?
>> Actually, I believe these values comes from the eMMC specification?
>> Shouldn't they be moved to the mmc core instead?
>
> That sounds like good consolidation, but can we do that in a follow-up
> patch? This fixes the driver for me and I was hoping to make something
> minimal to go back to stable trees.
Sure, if my opinion is ok, i will do it after apply your patches.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists