lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140908120140.GA17728@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:01:41 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Jen-Cheng(Tommy) Huang" <tommy24@...ech.edu>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf: Remove redundant parent context check from
 context_equiv

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:48:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > The thing is; I don't understand those reasons. That commit log doesn't
> > > explain.
> > 
> > Ah wait, I finally see. I think we want to fix that exit path, not
> > disallow the cloning.
> > 
> > The thing is, by not allowing this optimization simple things like eg.
> > pipe-test say very expensive.
> 
> So its 179033b3e064 ("perf: Add PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT state for events
> with exited task") that introduces the problem. Before that things would
> work correctly afaict.

hum, I dont think so.. because the perf_remove_from_context set event
to PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF state anyway.. thus making any new cloned events
disabled

the PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT should be just notification for poll to return HUP

> The exit would remove from the context but leave the event in existence.
> Both the fd and the inherited events would have references to it, only
> once those are gone do we destroy the actual event.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ