linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf: Remove redundant parent context check from context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2014 14:19:52 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Jen-Cheng(Tommy) Huang" <tommy24@...ech.edu>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf: Remove redundant parent context check from
 context_equiv

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:39:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:48:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > > The thing is; I don't understand those reasons. That commit log doesn't
> > > > explain.
> > > 
> > > Ah wait, I finally see. I think we want to fix that exit path, not
> > > disallow the cloning.
> > > 
> > > The thing is, by not allowing this optimization simple things like eg.
> > > pipe-test say very expensive.
> > 
> > So its 179033b3e064 ("perf: Add PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT state for events
> > with exited task") that introduces the problem. Before that things would
> > work correctly afaict.
> > 
> > The exit would remove from the context but leave the event in existence.
> > Both the fd and the inherited events would have references to it, only
> > once those are gone do we destroy the actual event.
> 
> I have another 'problem' with 179033b3e064. What if you 'want' to
> continue monitoring after the initial task died? Eg. if you want to
> monitor crap that unconditionally daemonizes.

right.. did not think of that.. need to check more, but
seems like just the check for children should be enough

jirka


---
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index bf482ccbdbe1..341d0b47ca14 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3568,6 +3568,19 @@ static int perf_event_read_one(struct perf_event *event,
 	return n * sizeof(u64);
 }
 
+static bool is_event_hup(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	bool no_children;
+
+	if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT)
+		return false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&event->child_mutex);
+	no_children = list_empty(&event->child_list);
+	mutex_unlock(&event->child_mutex);
+	return no_children;
+}
+
 /*
  * Read the performance event - simple non blocking version for now
  */
@@ -3582,8 +3595,7 @@ perf_read_hw(struct perf_event *event, char __user *buf, size_t count)
 	 * error state (i.e. because it was pinned but it couldn't be
 	 * scheduled on to the CPU at some point).
 	 */
-	if ((event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR) ||
-	    (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT))
+	if ((event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR) || (is_event_hup(event)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (count < event->read_size)
@@ -3614,7 +3626,7 @@ static unsigned int perf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 
 	poll_wait(file, &event->waitq, wait);
 
-	if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_EXIT)
+	if (is_event_hup(event))
 		return events;
 
 	/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/