lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 8 Sep 2014 21:57:14 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	"Romer, Benjamin M" <Benjamin.Romer@...sys.com>
Cc:	"Kershner, David A" <David.Kershner@...sys.com>,
	*S-Par-Maintainer <SParMaintainer@...sys.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: uislib: uislib.c: sparse warning of
 context imbalance

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Romer, Benjamin M wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 14:52 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > fixed sparse warning : context imbalance in 'pause_device' 
> > 			unexpected unlock
> > this patch will generate warning from checkpatch for 
> > lines over 80 character , but since those are user-visible strings
> > so it was not modified.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > hi , can you please review the patch and see if the approach is correct.
> > The functiion is still doing the same what it was doing , only the logic
> > is changed. if the approach is ok, then i can send a patch to fix the
> > other two similar warning in the file.
> 
> Hi Sudip,
> 
> I was able to successfully build and test your patch. The changes look
> good to me too, so I think we should take this patch. :)
> 
> Thanks!
> -- Ben
> 
Hi Ben,
thanks. the same file is having two more similar warnings. if you want i can
resend a patch fixing all the three warnings , or i can send two separate
patches. 
I personally will prefer two separate patches , as that will be
easier for you to test and review.

thanks
sudip

> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>
> Tested-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ