linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140910075954.GW3588@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:59:54 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for
 PRECDIST

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on
> > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags.
> 
> What's magic about nehalem and westmere?

And core2 and whatever else we support PEBS for, for that matter.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped