[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQBVRph9+aXC6F3=QxkVXXYVH8wM4rPwKBY8dpCtf1z_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:37:14 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Use INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT for PRECDIST
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:49:08PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>> >
>> > The earlier commit 86a04461a made near all PEBS on
>> > Sandy/IvyBridge/Haswell to reject non zero flags.
>>
>> What's magic about nehalem and westmere?
>
> And core2 and whatever else we support PEBS for, for that matter.
nhm, wsm, core2 do not have precise distribution (PREC_DIST) umask to
inst_Retired.
But as I said before, PEBS events do not support any filters. cycles
-> uops_retired:any_inv=1:cmask=1
being an exception.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists