[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5410A316.8090700@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:14:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86, mm, pat: Change reserve_memtype() to handle
WT
On 09/10/2014 11:26 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
>> This patch changes reserve_memtype() to handle the WT cache mode.
>> When PAT is not enabled, it continues to set UC- to *new_type for
>> any non-WB request.
>>
>> When a target range is RAM, reserve_ram_pages_type() fails for WT
>> for now. This function may not reserve a RAM range for WT since
>> reserve_ram_pages_type() uses the page flags limited to three memory
>> types, WB, WC and UC.
>
> Should it fail if WT is unavailable due to errata? More generally,
> how are all of the do_something_wc / do_something_wt /
> do_something_nocache helpers supposed to handle unsupported types?
>
Errata, or because it is pre-PAT hardware. Keep in mind that even
pre-PAT hardware supports using page tables for cache types, it is only
that the only types supposed are WB, WT, UC.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists