[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410377428.28990.260.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:30:28 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86, mm, pat: Change reserve_memtype() to handle
WT
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:26 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> > This patch changes reserve_memtype() to handle the WT cache mode.
> > When PAT is not enabled, it continues to set UC- to *new_type for
> > any non-WB request.
> >
> > When a target range is RAM, reserve_ram_pages_type() fails for WT
> > for now. This function may not reserve a RAM range for WT since
> > reserve_ram_pages_type() uses the page flags limited to three memory
> > types, WB, WC and UC.
>
> Should it fail if WT is unavailable due to errata? More generally,
> how are all of the do_something_wc / do_something_wt /
> do_something_nocache helpers supposed to handle unsupported types?
When WT is unavailable due to the PAT errata, it does not fail but gets
redirected to UC-. Similarly, when PAT is disabled, WT gets redirected
to UC- as well.
The failure case above is a run-time error when WT is enabled and is
targeted to RAM. In this case, reserve_memtype() fails and sets UC- to
*new_type due to the limitation in page tables. set_memory_xzy()
interfaces do not retry with new_type, but return an error. I think
this makes sense since the caller should receive this error as this case
is a bug in the code (while running it on an old system is not a bug).
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists