[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1410378027.28990.268.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:40:27 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Yigal Korman <yigal@...xistor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] x86, mm, asm-gen: Add ioremap_wt() for WT
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:29 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
:
> > +#ifndef ARCH_HAS_IOREMAP_WT
> > +#define ioremap_wt ioremap_nocache
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> This is a little bit sad. I wouldn't be too surprised if there are
> eventually users who prefer WC or WB over UC if WT isn't available
> (and they'll want a corresponding way to figure out what kind of fence
> to use).
Right, this redirection is not ideal for the performance, but it is done
this way for the correctness. WT & UC have strongly ordered writes, but
WB & WC do not.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists