linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd/axp2xx: extend axp20x to support axp288 pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140910131103.4f0e06fc@ultegra>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:11:03 -0700
From:	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	IIO <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DEVICE TREE <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Zubair Lutfullah <zubair.lutfullah@...il.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de>,
	Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@...oo.fr>,
	Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@...il.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Ramakrishna Pallala <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd/axp2xx: extend axp20x to support axp288 pmic

On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:13:54 +0100
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> I think adding ACPI support should be in its own patch.
Agree with the rest reviews comments. On this one, I agree I should
take out the non-essential part of the ACPI code. i.e. mfd cell
device for acpi opregion handler driver. Let it be part of opregion
handler driver submission later on.

However, the enumeration part of the ACPI code is essential to support
this device since it is intended to be enumerated under ACPI only, a
customized PMIC for Intel.

Thanks,

Jacob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/