[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140911070710.GA25251@audiosh1>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:07:12 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...escale.com>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
CC: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, <timur@...i.org>,
<Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.de>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] ASoC: fsl_ssi: refine ipg clock usage in this module
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:36:51AM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:42:04AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:12:53PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > > Then we can get a patch like:
> > > > open() {
> > > > + clk_prepare_enable();
> > > > ....
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > close() {
> > > > ....
> > > > + clk_disable_unprepare()
> > > > }
> >
> > > what is the open() and close()? do you mean the fsl_ssi_startup()
> > > and fsl_ssi_shutdown()?
> >
> > Yea.
> >
> > > > probe() {
> > > > clk_get();
> > > > clk_prepare_enable();
> > > > ....
> > > > if (xxx)
> > > > - goto err_xx;
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > ....
> > > > + clk_disable_unprepare();
> > > > return 0;
> > > > -err_xx:
> > > > - clk_disable_unprepare()
> > > > }
> >
> > > If this probe() is fsl_ssi_imx_probe(), I think no need to add
> > > clk_prepare_enable() or clk_disable_unprepare(), seems there is no
> > > registers accessing in this probe.
> >
> > This is trying to be safe, especially for such a driver being used
> > by multiple platforms. You can omit this as long as the patch can
> > pass the test on old imx, PowerPC, and AC97 platforms.
> >
> > >
> >
> > And another risk just came to my mind is that there would be a
> > possibility that a machine driver would call set_dai_fmt() early,
> > after SSI's probe() and before SSI's startup(), if the machine
> > driver contains dai_fmt assignment in its probe(). Then, without
> > regmap_mmio_clk(), it'll be tough for us over here because we may
> > also need to add clock enable/disable for set_dai_fmt/set_sysclk(),
> > even if there might be still tiny risk that we missed something.
>
> Thanks, didn't thought about that. As there are no restrictions on when
> these functions may be called, it has to be handled.
>
> >
> > Then there could be a selfish approach to circumvent it is to use
> > regmap_mmio_clk() with "ipg" at the beginning and call regmap_mmio()
> > without "ipg" if getting a failed return value from regmap_mmio_clk,
> > and meanwhile to keep the clock always enabled for the regmap_mmio()
> > case just like what the current driver is doing. This may result
> > those non-ipg-clk platforms can't benefit from this refinement
> > unless they update their DT bindings -- use "ipg" for core clock
> > This might be the safest and simplest way for us, I'm not sure
> > everyone would be comfortable with this idea though.
>
> I like the "selfish" approach. It would save a lot of clock
> enabling/disabling and error handling and at the same time it doesn't break
> the DT compatibility. The platforms with an old DT would have the old
> behaviour, but that could be changed by updating the devicetrees which
> should be easy to do for all the imx SoCs.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Markus
>
Thanks Markus and Nicolin
I have sent version 2 for this patch. Please review it.
best regards
wang shengjiu
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists